
Both
trade and craft guilds were the main axis of economic activity in Ottoman towns.
There existed guilds in every corner of the market areas, and members of each
craft came together under each one of these guilds. As these towns grew, specialisation
and division of labour grew leading to the creation of even more guilds. For
example, in the 17th Century, at a medium sized town like Edirne, the guilds
involved in leather were organised under different guilds such as shoemakers,
slippermakers or bootmakers. As an example to this situation one can quote the
description of the famous Ottoman traveller Evliya Çelebi of a parade in Istanbul
in the 17th Century as saying 260,000 people of the city was a member of 1,100
guilds that existed. However it would be more appropriate to consider these
figures as an indication of the states interest in guilds to control the population
of the city and not as -at least partially- organisations of trade and crafts.
The master-apprentice relationship constructed the basis of the
guilds.
Apprentices who started to work at very young ages would work under the supervision
and strict discipline of their masters and would learn the fine skills of the
crafts which were passed on to generations through this relationship.Promotion
of an apprentice to the status of kalfa was subject to the approval of the guild's
executive board. Such promotions would be marked with a "Wearing of the
Apron" ceremony. Being the guilds most important function, regulation of
the guilds were maintained through such face-to-face relationships.
The hierarchy in the foundation of the guilds was reflected in every stage of
the organisation. Masters in all professions would elect one of their fellow
masters (kethüda) to ensure the observation of such regulations and to manage
the relationship with the state. If a group of masters from a certain guild
would decide to form their own guilds, they would yet again have to choose a
representative to apply to the local judge (kadı). The masters of guilds had
the right to re-elect the same representative. In addition, in every guild there
existed a religious representative (şeyh) who had no other responsibilities.
On top of all such representatives was the city reprasentative (şehir kethüdası).
Another position within the guild was a representative (yiğitbaşı) to implement
the interior regulations who ranked below the master representative. Such a
representative would be elected from among the experienced masters and would
stand for the master representative whenever necessary.
The interior representative would supply and distribute the required raw materials,
control the quality of the production, and deliver such products to the shops
or other guilds. In such activities, expert representatives (ehl-i hibre) selected
from among new masters would assist the interior representative. Such experts
played a vital role in guilds such as silk weaving which required intense quality
control and expertise. In larger and sophisticated guilds these experts actually
formed the management board. The most important function however, of hierarchy
of the guilds at the city level was to allocate shares of the tax burden set
out by the state among the guilds and their masters and to collect and deliver
to the state such collections.
Despite the effort of the guilds to restrict competetion among members and control
the production, some guilds already had economic and social differences by the
beginning of the 16th Century.Such differences existed not in small towns but
larger cities in which the guilds produced for larger markets.
One of the best examples of this situation is Bursa silk weavers guilds which
produced silk fabrics from Persian yarn and sold it within the empire and outside
the empire to far away markets. A survey conducted by the state when silk yarn
could no longer be imported due to the Ottoman-Iran war of 1586, showed that
483 silk looms in Bursa were shared between 25 masters. Among these masters
some had only one to ten looms. There existed on the other hand masters who
were capable of running and financing of wages and raw material costs of 50
to 60 looms. The capitals of such masters were estimated at around 2,500 to
3,000 Venetian gold coinIt is understood from justice records that in the 15th
and 16th Centuries capitals of most of the masters in Bursa involved in silk
weaving was already
numbers of manufacturers who were after a larger slice of the cake were and
thus produced outside the guilds, was steadily increasing. Consequently, the
disturbed masters of the guilds applied to the central government claiming masters
outside the guilds were violating the rules of the guilds. The inevitable happened
and the central state sided up with the guild hierarchy. Such manufacturers
were barred from entering guilds and disallowed to form any organisations outside
the guilds. Thus the central government was giving approval to the monopolistic
position the guilds already held.
To be continued...
Loncas or Ottoman guilds ran most of the economic
activity for centuries. Although now long forgotten,
the Grand Bazaar of today is subconsciously follows their trails. Prof. Şevket
Pamuk analyses the guilds and loncas:

Guilds,
given the static conditions of the societies before capitalism, should be evaluated
as organisations of different professions which provide stability and security
for its members while controlling and regulating market and production conditions.
And at the same time, would attach a special importance to social solidarity
between its members. As an example to this solidarity one can point out to the
funds set up to assist those members in need. They, through their political
power on local authorities, have managed to restrict either trading or production
activities outside their body, establishing themselves as monopolies.
The sole economic concern of the loncas indeed was not just to maintain their
monopolistic positions or to protect its members against competetion from outsiders.
They also sought to prevent competetion within themselves. To do so the loncas
would restrict its members from outgrowing the others. They had tight and detailed
regulations on many aspects of their trade or production, mainly on provision
and distribution of raw materials, working hours and conditions, sales prices,
wages and quality. The loncas had a very important role in Medieval Europe.
The townships demonstrated approval of the existance of the guilds because of
their contribution to their tax revenues, provision of political support, and
large share of involvement in production and trade. Thus the local authorities
have backed up to the best of their ability, the monopolistic position of the
guilds and have supported the rules and regulations set up by the guilds while
obstructing any production or trade outside them.
The development, differentiation and popularity of the guilds reflected a certain
stage at the development of production activities, specialisation, technology
and in general, powers of production in towns. But as centuries passed by, it
was understood that this monopolistic structure shaping under the static conditions
and restricting free competetion in times previous to capitalism , was holding
back the growth of the powers of production. Consequently it can be said that
transformation of feodalism into capitalism advanced only at places where the
economic and political powers of the guilds were limited or restricted.

Ottoman
guilds
in excess of 1,000 Venetian gold coins.
Apart from overseas markets and large city markets, the demands of the palace,
especially those of the army and the navy constituted yet another important
source of revenue for the accumulation of wealth of the guild wool weaving industry
in Thessaloniki sets a very good example of this situation. The Sephardique
Jews who escaped from the atrocities of 15th Century Inquisitions in Spain established
themselves in this city as wool weavers revitalising this industry. The felt
produced here accomodated the local demand and was exported to the Balkans and
even beyond the Danube River. But the largest proportion of the production was
sent to Istanbul for use by the Janisseries.
In the 15th and 16th Centuries it was inevitable that frictions would develop
between those guilds whose masters have accepted to work under strict regulations
and those who either had not been able to join a guild or those who had joined
a guild but continue production outside the guild to increase their profits
and capitals. We know that in Bursa as the market for silk fabrics expanded,
the